The transfiguration of Jesus in 2 Peter 1 video discussion

The lectionary epistle for the Sunday before Lent in Year A is 2 Peter 1.16–21.

It is a fascinating passage, as it appears to preserve an eye-witness testimony to the transfiguration which coheres with the gospels accounts but is independent of them.

From this, Peter teaches us not so much about Jesus’ resurrection but about his expected return, and offers vital insights into the nature of Christian hope.

The gospel reading is Matthew’s account in Matthew 17.1-9. You can find the written commentary on that passage here.

and the video discussion of it here.


This blog is reader supported, not funded in any other way. So why not Ko-fi donationsBuy me a Coffee


DON'T MISS OUT!
Signup to get email updates of new posts
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address

If you enjoyed this, do share it on social media (Facebook or Twitter) using the buttons on the left. Follow me on Twitter @psephizo. Like my page on Facebook.


Comments policy: Do engage with the subject. Don't use as a private discussion board. Do challenge others; please don't attack them personally. I no longer allow anonymous comments; if you have good reason to use a pseudonym, contact me; otherwise please include your full name, both first and surnames.

7 thoughts on “The transfiguration of Jesus in 2 Peter 1 video discussion”

  1. We see Jesus!
    Recently an elderly man moved into a local Care Home.
    One of our elderly lady friends [80?]
    began sharing her faith with him to an extent that she felt that a man from her church might be better suited to discuss more with him;
    This man encouraged him to attend the church.
    When he did attend he saw a figure in white speaking towards him behind the preacher.
    He related this with his mentor saying that he could not hear the sound of his voice because the preacher was speaking also.
    His mentor said “If you think that God is speaking to you why not join our Get to Know More group studies [a modified Alpha]
    Several weeks later he stood in the church testifying of his new found faith in Christ and his encounter with Him.
    The church might be “getting old” as one Bishop once said but He is still the Bright Morning Star in the darkest hours, His mercies are new every morning!
    This is our daily office of Thanksgiving and Joy.
    Shalom.

    Reply
  2. Truly that was a watershed mountain:
    On one side conflict and opposition; one the other a resolute setting of
    Christ’s face toward Jerusalem.
    Tom Austine-Sparks has a terrific commentary on
    “Men whose eyes have seen the King”
    @ .austin-sparks.net/english/books/000932.html
    A study which covers the Scriptures of people who saw God.

    “The Impact Of The Presence Of The Lord Jesus [T.Austine – Sparks]
    And do you notice how Peter describes this? “We were eyewitnesses of His majesty” – His majesty. Is not the need for the impact of the majesty of the Lord Jesus upon this earth? It should be. Again, he says: “We made known unto you the power and presence of our Lord Jesus Christ…’ I am sorry they have not translated that word thus; they have put ‘coming’. Of course, the word is very frequently related to the coming again of the Lord Jesus, but the word itself cannot be isolated to that. The same word is used of the apostles, when they came into a situation. It is the same word, whether the ‘coming’ or the ‘presence’. And Peter describes this as the “power and presence” of His majesty. Yes, that is the issue. The power, not as abstract and unrelated, but the power of His presence in His majesty – that is the holy mount; that is the high place; that is what the world needs.

    Reply

Leave a comment