I’ve recently noticed how often people quote John 10.10 ‘I have come that they might have life, and life in abundance’, often in the context of ethical debate. (I am not sure whether it is happening more, or just whether I am more alert to it.) When one person is arguing for a more restrictive ethical position, the response is given ‘But that doesn’t correspond to Jesus’ promise to give us life in abundance’, as a way of pushing back against a sense of restriction or limitation that is felt to be unreasonable. All roads lead to Rome, and in our current context all ethical issues lead to sexuality, so of course this has been appealed to in the sexuality debates. Dan Via, in his short book Homosexuality and the Bible, debating with Robert Gagnon, makes this case explicitly: since Jesus promises life in all its fulness (an alternative translation), and denying sexual expression to sexual urges does not look like ‘fulness’, then this teaching of Jesus must allow expression of our sexual orientation in sexual relationships. I am surprised to see this argument repeated, since it is so evidently flawed—the promise is made by someone single and celibate, so his own life contradicts this unless we think Jesus was asexual—but repeated it is.
We need to think, though, about the wider use of this phrase. What does ‘abundance’ mean in our culture, and what does it communicate when we use this language? It is sobering to search the internet for images of ‘abundance’, since there is no end of formulas about health, wealth and happiness, and links to methods of ‘affirmation’ about how wealthy I can become if only I repeat each morning ‘Wealth is naturally drawn to me’. (I was introduced to these ideas of ‘visualisation’ thirty years ago in a course on ‘new age thinking’ which was supposed to make us more effective as business managers. Not much appears to have changed.) We live in such a deeply materialistic culture that I think it is hard for many of us to dissociate ‘abundant life’ from material prosperity and security, and the gratification of our desires. Yet this also illustrates the appeal of our using it. There is a perception that Christians are, generally speaking, miserable and mean, and that the Christian life is one of denial and restriction. To counter this, we want to talk about joy and fulness of life—and rightly so. But without some qualification, can ‘abundant life’ communicate this well?
The term perissos, translated ‘abundant’ or ‘to the full’ is quite a strong word, deriving from the verb perisseuo which means ‘to overflow’. It only occurs here in John, and is not a very common idea in this gospel at all, though the verb does occur more often in the Synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke). It occurs twice in Matt 13.12 and 25.29 where Matthew repeats Jesus’ enigmatic saying ‘those who have will be given more, those who do not have, even what they have will be taken from them’. And it functions as symbolic of Jesus’ life and ministry in the ‘overflow’ of bread that is left over after the feeding of the 5,000 and the 4,000 (Matt 14.20, 15.37, Luke 9.17). But the term has a double edge given to it by Jesus’ warning:
Watch out! Be on your guard against all kinds of greed; life does not consist in an abundance of possessions’ (Luke 12.15).
Something similar is happening in Paul; in 2 Cor 8.2 he talks about the ‘overflow’ of the Macedonian Christians, which has come from their trials and poverty!
Within John 10 there are also some key dynamics that we need to note. Firstly, the emphasis on ‘life in all its fulness’ sits within the gospel’s emphasis on life (and its contrast with darkness) which is a key theological idea pervading the whole narrative from the very first chapter. This is part of John’s eschatological perspective, which for English readers is often muted: the term ‘eternal life’ is John’s equivalent of ‘the kingdom of God’, that which Jesus brings as the anointed one from the Father and which we must enter as we become disciples. The phrase in fact means ‘life of the age’, that is, the age to come, and though this often appears to be ‘realised’ in John’s gospel, it has an irreducibly future dimension to it.
We also need to note the context of conflict in which this saying comes; Jesus as the true shepherd is contrasting himself with ‘thieves and robbers’ who come to kill and destroy, whereas he comes to being security and life. Many commentators think this comes in the context of great insecurity for John’s readers. Jesus’ teaching about himself as good shepherd follows on from the healing of the man born blind in John 9; as a result of his testimony, he is ‘put out of the synagogue’ (John 9.22, 34) which might well have echoed the experience of Jesus’ followers in the 80s as ‘church’ and ‘synagogue’ split. This would have been a serious challenge to Christians, as they lost the protection of Jewish identity in an Empire that was hostile to new religious movements. In other words, Jesus’ promise of ‘life in abundance’ was key because it contradicted the appearance of things, rather than confirmed it.
I have been particularly challenged by this phrase whilst thinking about the messages to the seven churches in Revelation 2 and 3, and in particular the message to the church in Smyrna. It is the second of the seven, and this second message, along with the second last, to Philadelphia, are the two which contain no rebuke for the Christians in these cities. Smyrna was then, as now, a prosperous port, and one of the principal cities in the Roman province of Asia, rivalling Ephesus. It second-century bishop, Polycarp, was martyred for his faith, and the account of his life and death is one of the earliest accounts of martyrdom in the early church. It is the only one of the seven cities which still has an active Christian community.
The message from the risen Jesus is the shortest of the seven, at 90 words, and it is quite stark in its message. The Christians there are suffering ‘tribulations’, the term for suffering as they await the kingdom that is to come whilst living in a world which does not know God, and ‘poverty’. It appears that they are suffering the accusations recorded in John 9 from the Jewish community, and worse is to come. In an anticipation of what later happens to Polycarp, they are warned that some will be put in prison and they will be ‘tested’. The are called to be faithful ‘even to the point of death’.
What does ‘abundant life’ look like for these Smyrnan Christians? Two things stand out. Firstly, this life is hidden. Jesus knows their poverty ‘yet you are rich’. The outward appearance of their life is unimpressive, yet the hidden reality is that they are rich in faith and in the grace of God they have received in Christ. Second, this life is future, and they are called to live in the light not of how things are now, but how things will be. Their focus has to be on the ultimate realities—which will only clearly be seen in the ultimate revelation of the kingdom. As in John 10, the spiritual reality of abundant life stands in stark contrast to how things look in the outward appearance—it is prosperity, but not as we know it.
We do need to share the good news of Jesus’ offer of abundant life. But how do we do that in a way which avoids the misunderstandings that arise from our culture’s conception of what abundance looks like? Answers on a postcard, please…
Follow me on Twitter @psephizo. Like my page on Facebook.
Much of my work is done on a freelance basis. If you have valued this post, would you consider donating £1.20 a month to support the production of this blog?
14 thoughts on “What does ‘abundant life’ look like?”
This teaching is abundant in youth work books.
“Youth ministry is multi-faceted, it is not a one-dimensional activity; it is about facilitating and empowering young people to have the better, fuller, more abundant, rich and satisfying life that different translations of John 10:10 talk about. This involves being concerned about their whole lives, not just the faith bit, wanting to see them fulfil their potential and be all God created them to be.” (https://www.amazon.co.uk/Youth-Ministry-Multifaceted-Sally-Nash/dp/0281063427).
In the context of that book, apparently it looks like helping children achieve the five aims of Every Child Matters. You’re carrying out gospel youth work if children are “staying safe” and “enjoying and achieving”. This is not remotely an isolated example.
Mark how absolutely fascinating. I need to talk to my friend Sally about that…!
We exchanged emails on it, I think we agreed to disagree.
One thing which has struck me over the past year or two is that God’s commands flow from his *goodness*. He is the good creator, he knows us, he knows what is best for us – his commands are not merely arbitrary rules to prevent us having the fun we really deserve.
So – on sexuality (what else?) – God’s commands on marriage are best for us. Not simply morally right, but best in terms of the abundant life that Jesus talks about. It’s better even to live as a single person than disobey God’s commands. True life is found in self-sacrifice, in giving over oneself to God and others.
I think this has always been a counter cultural message, but perhaps especially today when there is so much talk of achieving your maximum potential etc. Maybe we need to be saying, “the things you want to achieve – abundant life – you can’t achieve in the ways the world tells you. Jesus achieves abundant life in a very different way…”
Well, staying with the issue that dare not speak its name… I am aware of the well-founded argument from the ‘other side’ that ‘abundance’ is not what many SSA/gay people experience, and have not experienced it from the church’s teaching either.
So I agree with your theology, but am aware that there is lot to do pastorally and persuasively…
“There is a lot to do” – never a true word was spoken! I think Ed Shaw makes a good start in The Plausibility Problem. But ultimately I think the only way someone in our society is going to accept that abundant life is found in Christ and following his commands whatever the cost is through the work of the Holy Spirit. “My sheep hear my voice”.
I agree. I became a Christian in 1985 from a non church background. The verse where Jesus says “I come to give you life, life in all its fullness” means life with Him as opposed to life without him that I had previously known. The spirit of God comes to dwell within you to direct and guide and lead you away from error. This has been my experience – a fullness of life even though I am continually in need or correction.
“We do need to share the good news of Jesus’ offer of abundant life. But how do we do that in a way which avoids the misunderstandings that arise from our culture’s conception of what abundance looks like? Answers on a postcard, please…~
Needs more than a postcard. Your opening post is pretty good.
I wonder if the idea of overflowing is worth stressing some more? That is, abundance of life that Jesus promises is not primarily for our own benefit, but rather that it overflows in blessing to others. A bit like John7:37f.
Mark, thanks very much for the observation. I am sure you are right…but I am not sure that that is the focus of the (limited) language used here in John. The similar usage in e.g. Luke 6.38 does talk about symmetry of how we treat others and how God treats us, but the ‘overflowing’ is about our experience.
John 7.37 is, of course, fraught with interpretive conundrums, though I think I am persuaded by Richard Bauckham’s reading of it as an allusion to the temple vision at the end of Ezekiel, and its connection with the blood and water flowing from Jesus’ side at his death.
I think Paul does pick up this idea in 2 Cor 8, but of course the overflow of generosity comes from poverty, not riches!
By the way, great to share in the service of your ordination as bishop. Great service and great occasion.
Recently I’ve watched a very old friend die of cancer, over the course of 16 months. She had a great deal of pain, mostly controlled with strong medicines. Amazingly, she was really full of joy despite this. She spoke endlessly of the closeness of The Lord Jesus, had streams of friends, hosted frequent meals.
She really was full of life until the last few days of unconsciousness. Her long and healthy life was similar: full of the live of God, full of faith, full of serving others in great gladness.
An example of ‘living even though they die’. A truly rich deep prosperous life.
Now I agree with what you wrote for the first time, but if you want gay folks to ditch any hope of a spouse or romantic intimacy for life in order to receive life in abundance as Christians, you had better shine very brightly to show that this superabundant life is worth the sacrifice. If it just means giving up on so much simply to fit into some sort of drab parish life which does not look very different from that of their partnered gay friends or non-believing straight ones, well, I’d say your missionary effort is a bit doomed.
An abundant Christian life is not about having more or satisfying self but being selfless. A selfless abundant life might look like a loss to this world but is gain in the Kingdom of God. What does it profit us to gain the whole world in abundance but lose our souls in the process.