Is Luke a gospel of symbolism?
Twelve years ago I presented a paper at the international Society of Biblical Literature comparing the symbolism of Luke with that of John. There has been a widespread view that John is a ‘spiritual’ or symbolic gospel, and that is true at one level, though John often includes more historical and eye-witness detail than the others. So we need to be careful not to see ‘symbolic’ as the opposite of ‘historical’. And we should therefore not immediately assume that this is an area where Luke and John are as far apart as is often assumed.
The paper is now going to be published in an academic volume, so I have revised and expanded it. I offer here part of the paper, looking at the nature of symbolism in Luke, and using the episodes of the miraculous catch of fish in Luke 5 and John 21 to compare the symbolism in Luke and John. You can read the full pre-publication version here: Symbolic Action in Luke and John.
It might seem too obvious to note the differences between Luke and John; after all, the observation of the differences between the fourth gospel and the synoptics has a long history. But the differences have always been in danger of overemphasis, and Luke’s differences with Mark and Matthew, and points of contact with John, neglected.
Cribbs (‘St. Luke and the Johannine Tradition’ JBL, 90.4, 1971) notes not only points of contact between Luke and John, but what he interprets as places where Luke and John agree over against Mark and Matthew. He lists nine significant examples, including the depiction of Jesus’ ministry beginning in the hill country of Nazareth rather than by the sea (Luke 4.14–16, John 2.1–11), the prediction of Peter’s betrayal happening in the upper room rather than on the way to the Mount of Olives (Luke 22.31–34, John 13.36–38), and Jesus’ post-resurrection appearances being in Jerusalem rather than Galilee (Luke 24.13ff and John 20.11ff). From this, Cribbs suggests that Luke is later than John (or some form of proto-John), and that part of Luke’s goal is to mediate the differences between John and Matthew/Mark.























