Blog Menu

What did Paul think of women’s ministry?

I am in the process of finishing a Grove Biblical booklet with the title ‘Women and authority: key biblical texts’ which aims to explore all the key texts in 28 (or more likely, 32) pages, due out in the next week or so. I am aiming to cover Gen 1, 2 and 3, Luke 24, John 20, Acts 18, Romans 16, 1 Cor 111 Cor  14Eph 5 and 1 Tim 2.

Here are my comments on Romans 16, which is important since we see here Paul offering direct comment on and evaluation of the ministry of women he knew.

Paul’s list of personal greetings in Romans 16 is exceptional in its length; perhaps in writing to a church he has neither founded nor visited, he needs to demonstrate his strong connections with it (France, p 10). Apart from general greetings to the households of Aristobulus and of Narcissus, he sends to greetings to twenty-seven individuals. Surprisingly, ten of the named people are women. A number of features here are worth noting:

  • Four of the women are said to have ‘worked hard’, either ‘in the Lord’ or ‘among you.’ The word Paul uses (kopiao) is the one he uses of his own apostolic ministry in evangelism and church building (1 Cor 15.10, Gal 4.11 and Phil 2.16) or of others’ (1 Cor 16.16, 1 Thess 5.12).
  • As noted above, he calls Prisca and Aquila ‘fellow workers’ (synergoi, v. 3), a term Paul uses elsewhere for others who were his chief associates in his apostolic mission, such as Timothy, Titus, Mark, Luke and Philemon. This supports the observation from Acts 18 that Prisca (Priscilla) and Aquila founded the congregation in Ephesus.
  • Phoebe (vv 1–2) is described as a ‘deacon’, and there is no reason to think this is not the same role as that mentioned in Phil 1.1 and 1 Tim 3.8 (Cranfield p 781). She is also described as a prostatis, which France (p 11) suggests is best translated as ‘benefactor’ or ‘patron’, though it also has strong connections with terms of leadership (see Romans 12.8; Cranfield p 782, 625–627). Payne (pp 62–3) argues for its meaning as ‘leader’, because (1) it is closely related to the cognate proistamenos in Rom 12.8, (2) ‘leader’ is listed ahead of ‘benefactor’ in some important lexicons (3) the NT uses another word for ‘benefactor’, euergetes, in Luke 22.25. We should certainly not rule out this meaning on the grounds that Paul could not conceive of a woman being a ‘leader to many, and to me’ (as some have done) since this would be a circular argument.
  • Junia (v 7) is described as ‘prominent amongst the apostles.’ Although some translations suggest this means ‘in the eyes of’ (that is, Andronicus and Junia are not part of the group of apostles), Cranfield comments that it is ‘virtually certain’ that the phrase means they are outstanding members of the group known as apostles (p 789; Dunn p 894). A number of translations use the masculine name ‘Junias’; the difference is in the Greek accenting. But this name is unattested, whereas the female ‘Junia’ is common; all the fathers and commentators up until the Middle Ages read it as feminine (Cranfield p 788, France p 11, Dunn p 894). Eldon J Epp’s book-length study of Junia confirms that the most natural way of reading this verse is that Junia was a woman and an apostle of some standing.

France concludes his discussion:

The cumulative impression from Romans 16.1–16 is that Paul numbered women amongst his closest fellow-workers in his apostolic mission, that they held positions of recognized authority in his churches, and that they were engaged in teaching and indeed ‘apostleship.’ … All this seems to be in a different world from 1 Tim 2.11–12, and to be hard to square with the belief that Paul’s principle of female ‘submission’ extends outside of the marriage relationship to include also the prohibition of authoritative ministry in the church. (France, pp 11–12)

 

, , , , , ,

14 Responses to What did Paul think of women’s ministry?

  1. David Holland April 6, 2011 at 6:16 pm #

    Ian,

    Thank you for your work on this topic. Will this be available across the pond?

    I was looking at and thinking about the tension between the Virgin Athena and Aphrodite WRT the Corinthian passages, based on your discussion in a previous post. Do you explore this in more detail in the booklet?

    Thanks again,

    David

  2. Sally Nash April 6, 2011 at 6:22 pm #

    Excellent summary – really looking forward to seeing the finished booklet and would be tempted to send it perhaps anonymously to one or two people!!!

  3. Ian Paul April 6, 2011 at 6:25 pm #

    David, yes it will be available from http://www.grovebooks.co.uk in about three weeks’ time. We can post to the US or you can get a pdf/e-booklet. I don’t go into any more detail, since the whole text is supposed to be inside 10,000 words!

    Sally, I’m thinking the same!

  4. Brian LePort April 6, 2011 at 7:48 pm #

    Great summary, thanks!

  5. Ian Paul April 6, 2011 at 8:23 pm #

    Thanks Brian. (Why not post a link on your blog?! Btw, I couldn’t see an RSS button anywhere on yours…)

  6. Alan Darley April 6, 2011 at 9:17 pm #

    Ian, Do you have any thoughts on the identity of the ‘elect lady and her children’ in 2 John? Is this a female house church leader?

    Alan

  7. Iain McFarlane April 7, 2011 at 9:07 am #

    Very helpful Ian – thank you.

  8. JS April 7, 2011 at 12:15 pm #

    Thank you for posting this Ian. I’m enjoying reading the research thus far.

  9. Brian LePort April 7, 2011 at 6:41 pm #

    Ian,

    A link has been posted!

  10. Brian LePort April 7, 2011 at 6:43 pm #

    As regards RSS, I added what I think WP offers to the right hand side of the blog. Not sure if that is what is needed.

  11. Ian Paul April 7, 2011 at 8:55 pm #

    Brian, thanks! And found RSS!

  12. Jeremy Ive April 9, 2011 at 2:01 pm #

    I thought that I had left a comment but is does not seem to have come through. I mentioned ‘Mary’ in v.6 who ‘worked for’ the church (which as you point out is how Paul describes is own church planting ministry). There is an early tradition about Mary Magdelene in Rome which deserves more respect than the patently fraudulent Medieval traditions of Mary in France (so beloved of the Holy Grail devotees). There is also Richard Bauckham’s persuasive identification of Junia ( with Joanna, who, as as witness to the risen Lord, was indeed an apostle. One might indeed argue that it was these women who were the founders of the church in Rome in the 30s — before Peter, who was probably in Rome in 42-44 (when, according to the tradition, he preached the sermons which became the basis for Mark’s Gospel; and later in the 60s just before his death at the hands of Nero.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Elsewhere (04.07.11) | Near Emmaus - April 7, 2011

    […] – Ian Paul asks what the Apostle Paul would have thought of women in ministry here. […]

  2. Elsewhere (04.07.11) | churchministrynews.com - April 7, 2011

    […] – Ian Paul asks what the Apostle Paul would have thought of women in ministry here. […]

Leave a Reply