Blog Menu

Can we still talk of being ‘lost’ and ‘found’?

NEWTON2_360The idea that those outside the Christian faith are ‘lost’ has, in the past, been of central importance in evangelical devotion. Around 10 million times a year, Christians sing John Newton’s autobiographical devotional hymn:

Amazing Grace, how sweet the sound,
That saved a wretch like me.
I once was lost but now am found,
Was blind, but now I see.

Newton was, of course, writing from his own experience, and seeing a sharp contrast between his previous, unreligious and irreligious former life, and what he now experienced. But this idea is more than merely experiential; it has been a central part of evangelical theology in the way that it understands the world. When I was leaving home for a gap year which included time in Israel (on a kibbutz), my youth leader gave me a copy of David Watson’s book God’s Freedom Fighters (later republished as Hidden Warfare) which set out his understanding of New Testament eschatology. In it, he explores how the NT talks of two ‘kingdoms’ or realms—the kingdom of this world and the kingdom of God—and that becoming a Christian means passing from one realm, one way of life, to the other. This understanding lies behind the ‘conversionism’ which David Bebbington identifies as one of the four key hallmarks of what it means to be evangelical, along with activism, Biblicism and crucicentrism.

But one of the interesting things that appears to be happening (at least in the C of E) is that, as mission finds its way into public discourse more often, and apparently with less embarrassment, the language of conversion has largely been left behind. There has been a tacit but widespread rejection of using the language of ‘lost’ and ‘found’ as a way of characterising the boundary between faith and non-faith. Brian McLaren, the theologian of ’emerging church’, recently posted on his blog a letter from an appreciative reader. This person had been brought up with precisely the kind of ‘in/out’ understanding of reality that I outline above, and was grateful that he had been able to move beyond this, in part through reading McLaren’s books. He goes on:

I have three parishes with falling electoral rolls (I am in Norfolk UK, three rural parishes) and falling Sunday attendance though I work my socks off from Monday through Saturday and can easily become discouraged and sad. It seems that though people love to hear that God loves them, they do not want to worship him. Whereas my old Charismatic/ evangelical persona would have been preaching salvation is through the blood and the cross – Get Saved!!!! Mind you, I’m not sure that would fill my churches today either!

However, I pray that the seeds I am planting with this gentler and more inclusive understanding will one day produce a harvest for God’s Kingdom that we can see this side of heaven! In the meantime I think [my denomination] will expire and God will do a new thing.

It is hard to miss the sense of relief that this person has found by shedding the burden of past, possibly unrealistic, expectations. But it is also quite hard to miss an important link here: because God is at work outside the Church, and even outside articulated faith, then it is not part of loving, Christian ministry to offer the challenge to ‘get saved.’ And, lo and behold, without such a challenge, the churches this person leads are not growing—in fact, this person is fairly clear that his denomination (I am guessing the C of E?) will simply disappear. I confess to having felt a great sadness in reading this—and not just a sadness of this minister’s toil and discouragement.

I hear a similar rejection of the ‘lost/found’ distinction all the time in media coverage of Christian events. A while ago, the morning service was broadcast from Worcester College, Oxford chapel. And in the intercessions, we were led in prayers to the Spirit ‘who is at work in all the world and amongst all people of faith.’ In a radio broadcast, it always sounds so uncharitable to assume that God is present amongst those who profess Christ in a way which is not true of those who don’t—and besides, it is not very British! This instinct was captured rather well in a Tweet sent by a friend following it:

‘So people are basically lovely and kind, strangely misguided at times and occasionally rude but mostly nice’.

A recent article in the Independent was quite clear how the Church could find new life—by having fashion shows, beer festivals and art installations.

This type of vicar is more likely to appear on Gogglebox than encourage everyone to be baptised via total immersion; I am referring not to Alpha Group leaders here but C of E vicars who, alarmed by the current sogginess of things, want to spice them up a bit.

It’s not about challenging people regarding faith, but about having a bit of fun. (As it happens, I am not sure that either of the people described in the article would agree with that.) But at one level, she has a good point—it does seem to work. People are drawn more by honey than by vinegar.


Of course, there are many other reasons, besides politeness, for dispensing with the ‘lost/found’, ‘in/out’ paradigm for understanding the relation between the ‘church’ (the body of believers) and ‘the world.’ For one, it can lead to a serious detachment between church culture and the world around. In Poole, we set up an afternoon service once a month for older members of the congregation who liked a traditional service, and offered a sandwich tea afterwards to which they could invite their friends. After several months, still no-one new had come. When we asked them why, the reply was ‘All our friends are already here!’ This group had become totally self-enclosed socially. Having a ‘lost/found’ theology does not have to lead to this, but it often does—and I think it is why many evangelical churches have struggled to take seriously an agenda of social engagement.

There are other problems with it too. Such an outlook can lead to a very static understanding of discipleship: once you are in, that’s it. The most important thing has happened. All that is left is to enjoy the new place you are in, rather than having a sense that this is the first step on a journey. And the ‘in/out’ approach can often have a credibility problem. Are Christians that good? Are non-Christians that bad? Do they really look lost, especially when they have reasonable houses, nice cars, and 2.4 kids making their way happily through the education system? Besides which, who wants to be told they are ‘lost’ in need of being found, or are sinners who need to repent? It doesn’t make church look very attractive.

For those in Christian ministry, there is a final blow to this kind of thinking. Can I really live with the burden that, in a parish of 10,000 souls where, even in a ‘successful’ church, I might be fortunate to see a few hundred on a Sunday, the vast majority are ‘lost’? If I really believe that, how do I sleep at night, let alone take a day off, go on holiday, or have any kind of life outside ministry? I think it is this, more than any other, which Brian McLaren’s reader is reacting to. But to abandon this understanding then raises the exact opposite set of challenges. If people are not ‘lost’, do I really need to ‘find’ them? If life is not all that bad, why should I follow the costly path of obedience to Jesus, and the costly path of Christian ministry—and why would I invite them to?


shepherdI was really challenged about this by listening to our friend Kim. Kim had no Christian background of any sort, but approaching her fifties, divorced and with the children having left home, decided she ought to sort her life out. So she looked online for somewhere that offered an Alpha course, came to ours, and became a Christian. She came with us on a week at Lee Abbey in Devon one summer, and I asked her about her story, and what difference it had made coming to faith.

It’s really hard to put it in words—becoming a Christian has just changed everything in my life. The best way I can describe it is that it is like being a child who has got lost, separated from its parents in a supermarket—and now had suddenly been found. That sense of relief, and the end of worry.

There is nothing quite like talking to someone who has recently come to faith for showing up, in sharp relief, the difference faith makes! And it reminded me that the Jesus of the gospels had a very developed ‘theology of lostness.’ At the core of his preaching on the kingdom was a call to radical change, to ‘repent’, or (perhaps better translated) start living with a complete change of mind and outlook. He goes on, in the Sermon on the Mount, to talk about the narrow road that leads to life and the wide road that leads to destruction (Matt 7.13–14). And it is in Matthew that, six times, Jesus talks of a place of ‘wailing and gnashing of teeth’ (8.12, 13.42, 13.50, 22.13, 24.51, 25.30).

Perhaps the most focussed teaching by Jesus on lostness comes in Luke 15, with the parables of the shepherd searching for his one lost sheep, the woman for her lost coin, and the father awaiting his ‘prodigal’ son. Jesus’ clarity about the ‘lostness’ of the lost puts a number of things in focus. The Red Letter Christian movement wants us to take notice of Jesus’ radical teaching on ethics—but to focus on Jesus’ words also highlights the lostness of the lost and the urgency of responding in what looks like a very ‘in/out’ view of life. And current discussion of Jesus’ ‘inclusiveness’ also gets a corrective. Jesus was really clear that the tax collectors, prostitutes and all manner of ‘sinners’ really were lost, heading for destruction and (as yet) outside God’s kingdom, which is precisely why he spent time with them. ‘The Son of Man has come to seek and save that which was lost’ (Luke 19.10); Jesus did not come to approve of such people or their lifestyle, but to include them in the dynamic of God’s transforming love. The ‘lost/found’ dichotomy appears to be a fundamental category of thinking and motivation for Jesus, and he appears to expect it will be for his disciples too.


Continuing through the NT, it appears that Paul, too, had a developed theology of the lost similar to that of Jesus. ‘Such you were, but you have been washed, you have been sanctified…’ (1 Cor 6.11). Before coming to faith, we were ‘dead in [y]our sins’ (Eph 2.1) until we made that remarkable transition to being made alive in Christ. ‘All have sinned…’ (Rom 3.23) and are enemies with God until reconciliation takes place (2 Cor 5.19). Put this way, it all sounds rather obvious and unavoidable. How can we read a page of the NT without seeing this ‘lost/found’ divide? But it means that mission is not simply about going out and ‘seeing what God is already doing and joining in’ as is so often said at the moment. If our mission follows that pattern (and motivation) of Jesus and Paul, then it must be much more about ‘going everywhere Jesus wanted to go’ (Luke 10.1) into places where people do not yet know God.

This leaves me with a challenge: can we (can I?) recover a theology of lostness that is motivating, realistic, credible and sustainable? Answers on a postcard, please…

(First published in September 2014)


Follow me on Twitter @psephizoLike my page on Facebook.


Much of my work is done on a freelance basis. If you have valued this post, would you consider donating £1.20 a month to support the production of this blog?

, , , , , ,

10 Responses to Can we still talk of being ‘lost’ and ‘found’?

  1. Mat Sheffield November 6, 2017 at 8:29 am #

    As you rightly say in your closing paragraphs, it is not about putting a label on people so they can be easily sorted into groups for Evangelical efficiency, but about describing a radical change in direction and circumstance that comes (can only come!) from following Christ and encountering the living God.

    We were Lost, but now we are found….
    We were Dead in Sin, but Raised to life….
    We were once a Kingdom of Darkness, but are now a people of Light…
    Once of Flesh, now born of Spirit…..
    Blind, but given sight…..

    There should be no wiggle-room in our theology for the half-alive christian zombie. I am not advocating a fire and brimstone ‘vinegar’ approach to preaching, but some things are black and white and should be described as such. It is a great shame that we have moved away (or seem to have) from this paradigmatic language, and towards an apologetically tame gospel, where people can follow Jesus and call him Lord without ever feeling the need to change much about themselves.

    Personally I had no ‘conversion’ experience, but looking back on my life now I cannot help but see the inward change in those terms. I never liked the song ‘Amazing Grace’ much (terrible, I know), I always preferred the lines in ‘And can it be’;

    “Long my Imprisoned spirirt lay, fast-bound by sin and natures night
    Thine eye diffused a quickening ray, I woke, the dungeon flamed with light!
    My chains fell off, my heart was free
    I rose, went forth, and followed thee.”

  2. Justin November 6, 2017 at 8:43 am #

    Great thought-provoking questions!

    I can’t see a problem with lost/found language when we keep it inside a framework of moral perspective, as describing a moral disorientation that has been corrected through the gospel.

    Perhaps it becomes a problem when the language of lost/found becomes exclusively the language of religious conversion, or is used to conflate the acts of conversion with the process of moral improvement–as if only by converting to a particular religious or denominational tradition can inferiors be conferred a superior moral status.

    Cheers from Berkeley!

  3. Simon November 6, 2017 at 9:51 am #

    Important theme to grapple with Ian – thanks.

    Jesus is never wrong – so his understanding of the human condition must always be right and relevant. His binery categories: lost/found, out/in, heaven/hell, narrow/broad gate, light/darkness must inform how we see the world. So yes, we not only can but must talk of being lost.

    What deeply saddens me in this post was the account of the Norfolk Parson who bemoans their falling congregations whilst admitting they have graduated from the gospel of salvation through the blood of the cross that they once held to. Are the two connected: decline in numbers & graduating from the saving blood? He has substituted the apostolic gospel for the pseudo-gospel of ‘gentle inclusiveness’ whilst thanking the emergent apostle of the divergent gospel for giving him small comfort in decline. The Norfolk parson speaks in Biblical terms of the kingdom and harvest yet he has exchanged Biblical seeds for weeds. Our Norfolk parson needs to rediscover his apostolic call to herald the saving cross so the parishioners whose souls he has care for can be cared for.

    The ordination litany:

    For those who are lost and for those who have strayed,
    that they may return to the way of Christ,
    let us pray to the Lord.

    Lord, have mercy.

  4. Christopher Shell November 6, 2017 at 12:00 pm #

    It’s very interesting that I was thinking not 24 hours ago how the unchurched appear to love this hymn, and, together with that, love the idea of ‘I once was lost but now am found’.

    It is the sort of hymn that I am almost sure has been on Top of the Pops or the like. Very few hymns can manage that.

    It was on the Meryl Streep film Silkwood.

    Our church regularly uses it for baptism services and the unchurched sing it happily.

    (There is also an unrelated moral, that some of the most enthusiastic unchurched singing is for centuries-old material like Amazing Grace and also Christmas carols.)

  5. Nick November 6, 2017 at 12:45 pm #

    If we say to someone that they are lost and we are found, and they see no obvious difference in us then the message will be just put down as from a religious fanatic. In Acts 1:8 Jesus talks of us (all of us not just those with a particular gift) being his witnesses. Witness is something we do regardless – we are either good or bad witnesses we are never not witnesses unless we hide our faith altogether.

    It seems to me that those churches that grow are those whose members are committed disciples. When people see a difference in them we earn the opportunity to use language like lost and found that will have meaning to those who hear.

  6. Mike Hunkin November 6, 2017 at 1:30 pm #

    Thanks Ian for your thought provoking comments.Through faith we believe that Jesus is “friendly”, seeking our highest good. As “ambassadors” we too, it would appear, should be friendly too.We could sensitively share the Gospel and trust that the Holy Spirit will confirm the truth and our need. Perhaps Matt. 28 vv. 18-20 is a clue! Mike

  7. Simon November 6, 2017 at 7:31 pm #

    Mike – if the category for humanity is as Jesus says ‘lost’, I think we need more tenacity, urgency and passion about us than being ‘friendly’ and ‘sensitively sharing the gospel’. I am not sure ‘friendly’ and ‘sensitive’ is a term ever used of the tone and mission of a St Paul or St Peter.

  8. Philip Almond November 7, 2017 at 8:17 pm #

    Repeating myself yet again. The Bible is clear that we all face God’s wrath and condemnation from birth onwards and we are all born with a nature inclined to evil.
    As Article 9 says. And those who have in good conscience made the Declaration of Assent without believing ex animo those terrible truths are just not facing up to what the Preface to the Declaration and the Declaration itself say and mean and what Article 9 says and means.
    The final separation of us all – salvation and eternal life on the one hand, wrath and punishment on the other – can only be avoided by throwing the whole Bible into the bin:
    sheep and goats; those in Christ, those not in Christ; wise virgins and foolish virgins; those in the book of life, those not in the book of life; those who wash their robes and enter into the city, those left outside; those who believe in the Son, those who disobey the Son; those on whom God has mercy, those whom he hardens.
    This is part of the Apostolic gospel, alongside the wonderful truth that God and Christ invite all to submit to Christ in repentance, faith, love, obedience and fear, to cast ourselves upon his mercy in his atoning death and life-giving resurrection and so to be delivered from that wrath and condemnation and to be brought into a new relationship with God by the Spirit and ultimately be transformed into the image of Christ. The church is commanded to proclaim both parts of the message, lest we be held accountable to God for the blood of the lost.
    Applying the same rule of carefully understanding what the Articles say to what the Prayer Book says I admit that to make the Declaration also commits to the belief that ‘seeing now that this child is regenerate’ – the doctrine of Baptismal Regeneration. For that reason I could not make the Declaration because I believe that the careful wording of paragraph 6 of chapter 28 of the Westminster Confession gets it right:

    “The efficacy of Baptism is not tied to that moment of time wherein it is administered; yet, notwithstanding, by the right use of this ordinance, the grace promised is not only offered, but really exhibited, and conferred, by the Holy Ghost, to such (whether of age or infants) as that grace belongs unto, according to the counsel of God’s own will, in His appointed time.”

    The critical phrase being

    “.. to such (whether of age or infants) as that grace belongs unto, according to the counsel of God’s own will…” – in other words, to the elect only.

  9. Jamie Wood November 7, 2017 at 9:29 pm #

    Ian you write: “Having a list/found theology doesn’t have to lead to us having no non-Christian friends – but it often does.” I would love you to expand on how we can avoid this trap.

    A true friendship is a matter of give-and-take. That is, I come to the table with something to offer the relationship – but I have also to believe, in my heart, that what the other party has to offer me is of equal value. If I believe that I have been found, while he is still lost, then I cannot believe that what he offers me is of equal value. So a true friendship is impossible.

    In fact, while the Lord Jesus ate and drank with sinners, much of the rest of the New Testament, and almost all the Old, resolutely demands separation.

    I sure wish it didn’t.

    • Dave Summers November 9, 2017 at 11:17 pm #

      When I was a leader at Scripture Union camps, one of the standard answers to the question “How can I/you grow as a Christian?” was to spend time in fellowship with other Christians. This is true, and there are various times in my life when it has been particularly helpful. But as I have got older, I have found that another answer (which I have never heard at SU) is to spend time with non-Christians. Sharing lives, sharing interests, engaging in debate about faith and sharing different perspectives (not in isolation but as part of a broader friendship, otherwise the friend simply becomes an evangelism project) helps me to review my own faith and to be challenged, refined, corrected and strengthened. In this way, what the “other party” has to offer is of value.
      One of my favourite passages in Paul’s letters (because I have found myself living it) is 1 Cor 9:19-23. That does not describe separation but association – which is a context for a give-and-take friendship.I also like the “Message” paraphrase of this, which contains the sentence “I didn’t share their way of life, but I entered their world.” And to be allowed to enter their world is a privilege.
      Three years ago I sat with a self-confessed atheist friend and colleague who was dying of cancer. (I never quite believed he was an atheist.) Through conversation, and a piece that I had written and sent him, I think he looked towards at least the possibility of God. He said in that conversation that views could change. I was not preaching or proclaiming, but I think helping him to find the dormant God-sense that was already somewhere in him.
      I hope this helps.

Leave a Reply